Skip to Main Content
Jake Jensen, the Bullshit Artist (
hacksoff
) wrote
2013
-
01
-
05
12:31 am
Entry tags:
cfuw
,
threads
CFUW 141 - Adachi
I just wanna say, being "Eight of Hearts" kind of makes us sound like losers.
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-04 04:34 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Really? . . . how come?
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-04 04:35 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
We could've been King of Hearts! Now,
that
's an awesome codename.
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-04 04:36 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Being the King is a lot of responsibility, though. Eight's not a bad position.
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-04 04:37 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Eight of Hearts means you gotta follow the Queen's orders. And if we mess up, it's off with our heads, dude.
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-04 04:41 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Does it really?
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-04 04:43 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
You don't... You don't get it?
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-04 04:47 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
What I mean is, don't take it so seriously! It's all fine, right?
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-04 04:48 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Yeah, yeah... sure.
Anyway, uh... know anyone from the other, uh, teams? I literally don't know a single person out there.
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-04 04:51 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I know Shirogane . . . I've played with her before. Her and that old man. You've gotta watch out for both of them — they can be pretty tricky.
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-04 04:55 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Everyone's gotta be tricky in a game like this.
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-04 05:04 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Yeah, but even moreso.
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-04 05:05 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Guess we'll have to play it by ear once the clue thing comes up! Let's get serious tomorrow, or something. You know... if we're still around by then.
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-04 05:12 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Exactly!
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-05 03:06 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Oh, by the way! I miiiight have made a slightly suspicious vote to keep us in the game. We haven't done much, so we had to stand out somehow! I don't like landslides, so I threw a vote towards the other team that went out anyway in the ousting.
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-05 03:44 am (UTC)
(
link
)
No problem, dude.
I'll be around more for the coming days, sorry for all the trouble!
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-05 03:46 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Hey, no worries! I wasn't around much myself. Aaaand I'll only really be around for long periods of time during and after the ousting, I think.
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-05 04:16 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I'll try to make smart decisions for the both of us, then.
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-06 12:19 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Yo.
No idea who's the most suspicious among the guys in today's clue yet, but that Hero dude, Peter? He's being "too good to be true" right now.
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-06 12:22 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Huhhh. Hey, who's in the clue exactly?
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-06 12:25 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Ace, Five, and King. The old man you were talkin' about's a half of Ace.
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-06 12:32 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Hmm . . . I'm a little leery of five.
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-06 12:33 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Dude
. Don't doubt a guy named America.
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-06 12:35 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You can't tell me he's not suspicious. Taking charge without really doing anything?
no subject
hacksoff
2013-01-06 12:38 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Guess we're down to either Ace or Five, huh?
no subject
pierrotlafraude
2013-01-06 12:41 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I can't do much until the ousting, but look over everyhing. That America guy seems suspicious amd I remember thinking his partner was kinda awkward.
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 00:43 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 00:50 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 00:52 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 01:00 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 01:02 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 01:12 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 01:13 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 01:14 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 02:04 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 02:38 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 02:41 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 02:42 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 02:44 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 02:49 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 02:51 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 03:12 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 03:16 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 03:19 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 03:21 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 03:22 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 03:33 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 03:34 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 03:35 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 03:36 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 03:48 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 03:49 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 03:51 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 03:54 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 03:55 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 03:58 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 04:01 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 04:02 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 04:04 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 04:04 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 04:20 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 04:21 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 04:27 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 04:30 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 04:35 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-06 04:36 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 04:57 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-06 22:55 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pierrotlafraude
-
2013-01-07 03:17 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
hacksoff
-
2013-01-07 12:02 (UTC)
-
Expand
69 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Anyway, uh... know anyone from the other, uh, teams? I literally don't know a single person out there.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'll be around more for the coming days, sorry for all the trouble!
no subject
no subject
no subject
No idea who's the most suspicious among the guys in today's clue yet, but that Hero dude, Peter? He's being "too good to be true" right now.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)