hacksoff: (but mooooooom.)
Jake Jensen, the Bullshit Artist ([personal profile] hacksoff) wrote2013-01-05 12:31 am
Entry tags:

CFUW 141 - Adachi

I just wanna say, being "Eight of Hearts" kind of makes us sound like losers.
pierrotlafraude: (critical hit!)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
That was some pile-up on Ace. That's not good.
pierrotlafraude: (uhhhhhh.)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
How fast did the votes on Ace come in?
pierrotlafraude: (they're here to fix the TV.)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
Weird. It could be a suspicious pile-up, orrrr people could have just been waiting. I'm a little more leery of Five, but . . . well, I'll yield to your judgment on this round.
pierrotlafraude: (Default)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
. . . huh! I guess you were right from the start.
pierrotlafraude: (i-it's from the notebook!)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
I don't really care myself . . . I just don't want us to mess things up by scattering our votes!
pierrotlafraude: (uhhhhhh.)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
They would've eaten us on day one.

. . . but I can open a post to Shirogane.
pierrotlafraude: (let's do some shots.)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, not really.

Do you think it's Ace?
pierrotlafraude: (Default)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 03:36 am (UTC)(link)
Give me a moment!
pierrotlafraude: (I wish I'd just gotten a Teddy Ruxpin.)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
We're not, and here's why:

Between the two clues, there's one wolf and one sheep. As long as there's no safe sheep clue, the other wolves almost have to eat the remaining person from the clue if a wolf gets ousted. Understand? Because otherwise, we're left with a confirmed sheep and an upper leg over everyone else.

If we do get eaten and we're not named a safe, it's a shitty move because that's one less sheep to try and pin the blame on. The worst thing that happens is that people think we're suspicious. But that's not really the case here, is it? Because we're mostly talking with people from those clues. And by poking at them and catching them off guard, we get more out of them than we would in the game's environment.

Do you get it now?
pierrotlafraude: (they're here to fix the TV.)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude 2013-01-06 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
[shrugs.]

It wouldn't have been as effective. It's working out now, right?

(no subject)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude - 2013-01-06 04:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude - 2013-01-06 04:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude - 2013-01-06 04:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude - 2013-01-06 04:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pierrotlafraude - 2013-01-07 03:17 (UTC) - Expand