Between the two clues, there's one wolf and one sheep. As long as there's no safe sheep clue, the other wolves almost have to eat the remaining person from the clue if a wolf gets ousted. Understand? Because otherwise, we're left with a confirmed sheep and an upper leg over everyone else.
If we do get eaten and we're not named a safe, it's a shitty move because that's one less sheep to try and pin the blame on. The worst thing that happens is that people think we're suspicious. But that's not really the case here, is it? Because we're mostly talking with people from those clues. And by poking at them and catching them off guard, we get more out of them than we would in the game's environment.
I don't think that'd work out the way you'd want it to, and besides . . . that's pretty creepy, that you'd just go in after young girls like that. Eesh.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Between the two clues, there's one wolf and one sheep. As long as there's no safe sheep clue, the other wolves almost have to eat the remaining person from the clue if a wolf gets ousted. Understand? Because otherwise, we're left with a confirmed sheep and an upper leg over everyone else.
If we do get eaten and we're not named a safe, it's a shitty move because that's one less sheep to try and pin the blame on. The worst thing that happens is that people think we're suspicious. But that's not really the case here, is it? Because we're mostly talking with people from those clues. And by poking at them and catching them off guard, we get more out of them than we would in the game's environment.
Do you get it now?
no subject
no subject
It wouldn't have been as effective. It's working out now, right?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You.
Thief.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject